Wednesday, June 16, 2010

How Did You Get This Number

Stop that eye rolling. Give me a chance to explain—to explain why on earth I have joined the troupe of every clichéd twenty-something New York girl this side of the East River to have picked up Sloane Crosley’s newest book. Sarah, dear, you’re better than that. You just picked up four pieces of what will surely prove to be literary genius at the Strand last weekend, so why pick up such narcissistic candy to further confirm your choices, your ego, and your self indulgent lifestyle? Come on.

I know.

I know, I know, I know. Here's the thing. I try to keep this bloggy snappy. I fill it with the things I like, and leave the things that I don’t like for the birds. But lately, New York, I’ve been more disappointed than not. There seems to be less-to-fall-in-love-with these days. Like the oil spill. And Bradley Whitford’s new mustache. And Sex and the City 2.

More immediately, there is my broken cell phone. And the fact that Best Buy doesn’t sell radios and that every salesperson pointed me toward the iPod docks instead of radios furthering my liberal-arts-induced-depression that things like radios don’t really exist anymore. And that Chase Bank ate my entire paycheck with their tricky check deposit machines and a vague promise of perhaps locating it ‘in the morning’. And that Greg, my darling hair stylist, moved my hair appointment from Union Square to Soho without my knowledge, as, oh, my cell phone was dead as a doornail and I missed his text. And that I had a looming five hour hair appointment ahead of me WITHOUT MY DROID for distraction.

So... my point. I eventually found my way back down in Soho, and as I waited for Greg to finish up a mohawk on the uncomfortable looking young patron before me, and without a Droid to turn to, I opened up the first mindless magazine found on the sticky coffee table to an interview with Sloane Crosley on the release of her new book and subsequent HBO series. Huh, I thought as I noted the June 15th release date. That could help.

So with a flick of my frizzy red mane, ‘Greg, I’ll be back in five minutes!’ I dashed to McNally Jackson to pick up a (hardcover!) copy (at full retail value!) of Crosley’s latest collection of self indulgent essays, ‘How Did You Get This Number?,’ smartly dressed in Jill Greenberg’s book cover photograph of a crying bear. I love Jill Greenberg! And even if my sisters and my friends and my twitter account were completely unreachable without a cell phone, I knew that Sloane Crosley would understand my first-world-woes.

Well, five hours, four iced coffees, a one overpriced, shiny, straight, frizz-free head of red hair later, I had not only proven that a book is a FANTASTIC way to avoid small talk at the barber's, but reading an other's problems does help dilute yours a bit. That, and that books can be friends. I mean it.

People, this book is good, I'll just admit that right out. It's an incredibly quick read-- it can be read start to finish in one Keratin Treatment, one subway ride, and two glasses of wine, to be exact. It's the type of contemporary prose that you can settle into like a good conversation. You drink it, more than read it-- a trickery that works wonders on the blogging generation who can actually get away with writing like they talk.

Sloane Crosley grew up in Westchester County, went to a small liberal arts school where she studied English, and moved to New York to work in publishing upon graduation. She struggles with spacial relations, is always a bridesmaid, and befriended a black market dealer to scratch a high-end-furniture itch. She mocks New York tourists yet traveled to Europe alone and is brave enough to admit that she was lonely and hated it. She isn't unique... at all. She is every bright-eyed-bushy-tailed good girl to enter Gotham City in hopes of becoming less so. (Then fails miserably-- and there, dear reader, is your story.)

What was it that Joan Didion once said about keeping terms with our past selves? Or else they will show up at 4am and scare us to death? (Found it: "we are well advised to keep on nodding terms with the people we used to be, whether we find them attractive company or not. Otherwise they turn up unannounced and surprise us, come hammering on the mind's door at 4 a.m. of a bad night and demand to know who deserted them, who betrayed them, who is going to make amends."- Didion, Slouching Toward Bethlehem) Well, her past self seems to be Crosley's jumping point, and the confrontation her life raft. NOT THAT CROSLEY SHOULD BE COMPARED TO DIDION. But, I mean, she is a twenty-something New Yorker with a book of essays on the city itself. A comparision must be made.

Crosley takes her bittersweet time getting through these seven essays, Mike Birbiglia style. She is self deprecating in tone while retaining an optimistic and somewhat heartfelt outlook. It's smart and sardonic; witty and honest. She is the girl that you want to have at a dinner party because she knows how to tell a story, how to narrate her way into a gut laugh. Her first book, 'I Was Told There'd Be Cake' (great title.) was the result of an email she wrote on her account of getting locked out of the same apartment twice in one day. Lucky girl.

Its smart because of the telling, not the situation. Again, she is so incredibly normal. Yet that normalcy is her main source of contention. Its brilliant. And in a world dredged in oil, filled to the brim with saccarine champagne bubbles who will settle for Louboutins in place of smart emotion, Crosley is actually a nice departure. While her sarcasm is easily felt, it is matched note for note with real heartpouring as she watches a bear cub being shot in Alaska and deals with the aftermath of a boyfriend who ended up having a girlfriend all along. It hurts. Physically, it hurts. But we laugh with her and empathize with her and are able to then look at our own woes and sorrows with real perspective.

In the end, she isn't Joan Didion, but she isn't Carrie Bradshaw either and thank goodness for that. She is a sign of the New New York and, people, it could be worse. Now excuse me while I take my shiny hair down to Verizon Wireless to confront this city as I see fit.

Monday, June 14, 2010

Fire Island, part II

The best is that woman in the flower photo who randomly jumped in with a smile. Love her.

Sunday, June 13, 2010

Fire Island




If you can get out of New York this summer... do it.

Thursday, June 10, 2010

Polly Apfelbaum



Did you all find Polly Apfelbaum's work on your Google background for about an hour this morning? (We went gaga for it here at AiA.) I saw an exhibition of her work this past February at Locks Gallery in Philadelphia. She is so obvious it's almost frustrating, yet the simpicity is also what makes her great. The girl knows how to edit, I'll give her that.
Thanks, Google!

Wednesday, June 9, 2010

Here We Aren't, So Quickly

It has arrived. The New Yorker's double fiction issue. And I know it's incredibly obvious for me to write about JSF's story, but you know what, he hasn't published any fiction in YEARS, and its very exciting after a memoir about vegetarianism and some random editing work. No, I haven't read Eating Animals, and yes, I know I should.

His latest short story, 'Here We Aren't, So Quickly,' opens with a nervous energy similar to that in Extremely Loud and Everything is Illuminated. So much so that I got anxious reading the online version after work on Monday in fear of hating it (would there be anything worse!?) and waited an entire day for my paper copy to arrive to finish the story.

LUCKILY for the sake of my own sanity, after 2-3 paragraphs you will understand his prose, fall head over heels with its tone, and have tears streaming down your face at the final paragraph for the sheer beauty of it all. (It doesn't take much.)

It's the story of a lifetime and a relationship not unlike Didion's pedestrian heartpouring in The Year of Magical Thinking-- a review of the everyday made extraordinary, and the regret that comes with missing it. It's told through a sentence structure that you'll want to underline like we did in college, in hopes of adding it's brilliance to our own DNA. A yellow highlighter in place of originality, I suppose. A taste:

"I was always watching movie trailers on my computer. You were always wiping surfaces. I was always hearing my father's laugh and never remembering his face. You broke every one's heart until you suddenly couldn't [...] At a certain point you became convinced that you were always reading yesterday's newspaper. At a certain point I stopped agonizing over being understood, and became over-reliant on my car's G.P.S You couldn't tolerate trace amounts of jelly in the peanut butter jar. I couldn't tolerate gratuitously boisterous laughter. At a certain point I could stare without pretext or apology. Isn't it funny that if God were to reveal and explain Himself, the majority of the world would necessarily be disappointed? At a certain point you stopped wearing sunscreen."

Jonathan, you ol' sap!

Also online you will find an absolute treat-- along with lovely little line drawing portraits, each of the '20 under 40' authors answered a brief questionnaire. FUN!

While JSF's answers were perfectly satisfying, it was his wife, Nicole Krauss, who said it best. When asked what makes a piece of fiction work, she answered, "It's the ability to remind us of ourselves, of who we are in our essence, and at the same time deliver a revelation." And let me tell you, no one does it better than Krauss.... Except maybe Foer.

NEXT UP, Krauss's short story in the June 28th issue. And if you still aren't convinced to read The NYer's fiction, MIGHT I REMIND YOU that in past issues, Krauss's short story The Last Words on Earth eventually turned into The History of Love, and Jon's The Very Ridged Search turned into Everything is Illuminated. They know what they're talking about, those editors over there at Big Bad Conde Nast. So we should probably do our part, and listen.

Monday, June 7, 2010

The Year of Magical Thinking

Joan Didion is a writer to whom I continually return, usually after finishing a really good novel that inspires useless proclamations from my idiot mouth like, 'there aren't any good books left out there, I've read them all!' It's nice to turn to an old friend who I know won't disappoint. I'm often chided doing this instead of starting something new, but I've talked about why before, and my simplest reasoning is that of comfort. (Like that old Nickel Creek song... Others have excuses, I have my reasons why.)

I realize that Joan Didion isn't an obvious form of comfort, what, with her exhaustive realism and that stone cold prose. She is a realist in every way imaginable and holds nothing to terms of nostalgia or sympathy. Her work is the opposite of ostentatious-- its flat and stark and holds a clear note of not caring. In fact, she scares me most of the time, she really does. Yet, if you pay attention, you will find that beneath her harsh sentence structure with its absence of adjectives exists an adventure story, a field of answers and understanding that cuts banality with that ruthless stiff upper lip. She's funny, too, if you put your ear to the wall.

That said, the work that I've returned to this time, isn't my darling 'Goodbye to All That' or even the raw 'White Album' or blazing California fields in 'Slouching Towards Bethlehem.' I picked up dreariest Didion of all, 'The Year of Magical Thinking,' as I've been doing some magical thinking of my own (and if not reading for narcissistic value, why read at all!?).

It needs to be made clear, before picking up this book, and before taking my words at face value, is that it isn't a downer. Had I understood that before reading it, I may have liked it the first time, instead of growing angrier and angrier at page after page of this:

"Grief turns out to be a place none of us know until we reach it. We anticipate (we know) that someone close to us could die, but we do not look beyond the few days or weeks that immediately follow such an imagined death. We misconstrue the nature of even those few days or weeks. We might expect if the death is sudden to feel shock. We do not expect this shock to be obliterative, dislocating to both body and mind."

I know, right? Yikes.

The first time I read it, I didn't completely digest the idea of 'magical thinking', which is the absolute point of the book. The story exists in the loss of her husband (fellow writer John Gregory Dunne) and the devastating grief that follows. Yet the book is about (listen closely!) a specific coping mechanism of the human spirit. And that, dear reader, is absolutely fascinating.

Didion describes 'magical thinking' as not giving away her late husband's favorite shoes because he might need them, or having to fly back to California in case he comes home. She KNOWS he is dead and gone yet continually tricks herself into acting otherwise. In short, grief makes us crazy. We (I!) do it too. All of the time.

Like many stories of loss, this one is beautiful because it was told too soon. Didion wrote it in the midst of her grief, not as a reflection years later. It is therefore not only raw, but a little crazy. It's the observation of the true observationist, a coin flipped on its head that thrills her readers. She isn't as flat in this telling, as it bounces from clear statements ("Grief is the most general of afflictions.") to wandering to the colloquial ("The singer of the song about walking on through the storm assumes that the storm could otherwise take her down.")

She focuses on shards of memory that haunted her in those first months, like an offhanded comment from John that she may have misinterpreted. Was he talking about Hawaii when he said I was right? Was he hinting at Quintana's illness? (Oh yeah, her daughter is also terminally ill during the entire text, so fun!) It is within these tangents that Didion loses a bit of her terseness and authority. She allows vulnerability in the moment, and does so unapologetically. I focus on the language because, in the end, language is her tell.

And even without the understanding of magical thinking, and cutting through the prose and verbage, 'The Year of Magical Thinking' remains readable because it's also a love story. A real love story-- one so ordinary in its inception that it seems drafted. We learn the story of a marriage as told through grief, and notes on a husband from the one who loved him most. It's the story of love after the infatuation has faded-- the untold happy monotony that New Yorkers label boring (yet examine in awe.)

Woven throughout this love story is also the 'writer' story that Didion slips in out of necessity. We learn her writing process, as she lets us into her day to day life, both before and after the death of her husband. We learn that she keeps cards in her pocket for sudden story ideas, and exchanged notes with John over dinner.

I've read these passages more than any other, and melt when John gives her his card about baseball. It's another shard that she gets stuck on, but I take it as a lesson on How To Be Good At Writing. Writing was breathing to Didion, something I think about often, while living in the city that she contemplated so deeply when wandering around as a 26-27-28 year old girl. Writing was part of her love story, which I can't help but admire in my own magical thinking.

'A Year of Magical Thinking' is so brave that it makes you ache, not the other way around. It yields strength and inspiration to its reader without lecturing us on how to handle loss. She leaves that for Emily Post, and even marvels her for it. But by attending ferociously to her actions throughout grief, Didion arrives at the difference between "the insistence on meaning" and the reconstruction of it. She notes that distinction and bravely embodies it: "We tell ourselves stories in order to live." Which is also, perhaps, why we return to them.

Thursday, June 3, 2010

The New Yorker's '20 Under 40'

Well well well, look who made The New Yorker's '20 under 40' list of top fiction writers--- my lover Jonathan Safran Foer and his wifey Nicole Krauss. So deserved!

The rest of the list actually makes me feel really stupid, as I've only heard of half of the writers, and read even less of them. MINOR PANIC ATTACK. Where did these people come from and why am I so stupid?!!?!?

However, I have read PAST winners who are now over 40, I guess, inlucing my old neighbor Jhumpa Lahiri, and the magnificent Junot Díaz, plus Michael Chabon, Jeffrey Eugenides, and David Foster Wallace. Stupid, but not THAT stupid, right? Ugh.

The official list:
Chimamanda Ngozi Adichi
Chris Adrian
Daniel Alarcón
David Bezmozgis
Sarah Shun-lien Bynum
Joshua Ferris
Jonathan Safran Foer
Nell Freudenberger
Rivka Galchen
Nicole Krauss
Yiyun Li
Dinaw Mengestu
Philipp Meyer
C. E. Morgan
Téa Obreht
Z Z Packer
Karen Russell
Salvatore Scibona
Gary Shteyngart
Wells Tower